We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
Quintessence International



Forgotten password?


Quintessence Int 32 (2001), No. 3     1. Mar. 2001
Quintessence Int 32 (2001), No. 3  (01.03.2001)

Page 239-242

Ease of use versus clinical effectiveness of restorative materials
Burke, F. J. T. / Liebler, M. / Eliades, G. / Randall, R. C.
Ease of use, as applied to dental materials and techiques, means different things to different people. Factors that may contribute to ease of use include a minimum number of application stages, easy application and shaping ability, quickness of use, lack of stick, and moisture sensitivity. Ease of use may also imply that a material or technique does not cause stress for the dentist and patient, is cost effective, is easy to learn, and should provide the operators with a sense of satisfaction with their work. Similarly, clinical effectiveness of the treatments prescribed for patients is not always capable of being accurately defined. Suggested factors that may contribute to clinical effectiveness include a lack of patient complaints with respect to longevity and/or cost, no secondary caries, and preservation of the remaining tooth structure during functional loading. Ease of use and clinical effectiveness are not necessarily related, but they must be combined for a technique to be successful. The achievement of this demands a partnership between clinicians, manufacturers, and patients.