We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
Quintessence International
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

Quintessence Int 38 (2007), No. 6     30. May 2007
Quintessence Int 38 (2007), No. 6  (30.05.2007)

Online Article, Page 525, PubMed:17625616


Online Article: Effects of attachment design on strains around implants supporting overdentures
Cekic, Cihat / Akca, Kivanc / Cehreli, Murat C.
The objective of this study was to compare strain magnitudes around implants supporting ball-retained, bar-retained, and distal cantilevered bar-retained mandibular overdentures subjected to vertical and oblique loads. Twelve edentulous mandibular acrylic resin casts with 2 implants in the parasymphyseal region were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 4). Ball-retained, bar-retained, and distal cantilevered (8 mm) bar-retained overdentures were fabricated. A linear strain gauge was bonded distal to each supporting implant on the surface of the cast. As static loads of 20, 40, and 60 N vertically were applied 20 degrees obliquely and unilaterally to the overdenture, the generation of strains was recorded by a data acquisition system and corresponding software at a sample rate of 1,000 Hz. The absolute strain data of each group were compared within each loading condition by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post hoc tests (a = .05). Under vertical and oblique loading conditions, strain magnitudes around implants supporting ball-retained overdentures were higher than those induced around bar-retained and distal cantilevered bar-retained overdentures (P < .01). On the contralateral side from load application, strains around implants supporting ball-retained overdentures were lower than those around bar-retained and distal cantilevered bar-retained overdentures (P < .01). Force distribution does not occur for implants supporting ball-retained overdentures, and such implants are subjected to more load than those supporting bar-retained and distal cantilevered bar-retained overdentures.

Keywords: Dental implants, overdenture, biomechanics, strain gauge