We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
Quintessence International



Forgotten password?


Quintessence Int 49 (2018), No. 10     19. Oct. 2018
Quintessence Int 49 (2018), No. 10  (19.10.2018)

Page 781-786, doi:10.3290/j.qi.a41182, PubMed:30264059

CAD/CAM diamond tool wear
Roperto, Renato Cassio / Lopes, Fabiane Carneiro / Porto, Thiago Soares / Teich, Sorin / Rizzante, Fabio Antonio Piola / Gutmacher, Zvi / Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião de
Objective: This study evaluated the wear of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) burs and the morphologic changes after a number of millings.
Method and Materials: Diamond burs (cylinder and step-bur) were divided into four milling groups: zero millings (G0); 15 millings (G1); 25 millings (G2); and 35 millings (G3). Seventy-five premolar crowns were milled using the Cerec Compact Milling unit and VitaBlock Mark II. Surface roughness, three-dimensional profile, and SEM were used for wear and surface damage evaluation.
Results: Two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α = .05) showed that G3 produced statistically different values compared to G0 and G2, but not G1. The cylinder burs showed higher roughness values than step-burs for all groups. SEM showed similar diamond particle damage for cylinder burs and step-burs, and signs of surface damage, cracks, and particle losses for G3.
Conclusion: Both cylinder burs and step-burs were able to sustain a larger number of milling procedures than indicated by the manufacturer.

Keywords: CAD/CAM, dental technology, diamond burs, prosthodontics, roughness