We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
Quintessence International



Forgotten password?


Quintessence Int 47 (2016), No. 9     22. Sep. 2016
Quintessence Int 47 (2016), No. 9  (22.09.2016)

Page 775-783, doi:10.3290/j.qi.a36685, PubMed:27660847

Gingival recession coverage: Do we still need autogenous grafts?
Kasaj, Adrian
A variety of periodontal plastic surgical techniques have been proposed to obtain root coverage of gingival recession defects. All of the available root coverage procedures are able to provide significant root coverage for Miller Class I and II recession-type defects. However, only the subepithelial connective tissue graft in conjunction with a coronally advanced flap appears consistently effective across all clinical parameters, and is therefore currently considered the gold standard for gingival recession therapy. The major shortcomings of connective tissue graft procedures include patient morbidity associated with the second surgical site and limited availability of palatal donor tissue. More recently, 3D collagen matrices of human and porcine origin have been introduced as possible alternatives to autogenous connective tissue grafts in recession coverage procedures. This paper aims to give an overview on the possible use of collagen matrices as soft tissue substitutes and a possible alternative to connective tissue grafts in the surgical treatment of gingival recession defects.

Keywords: 3D collagen matrices, acellular dermal matrix, collagen, connective tissue grafts, gingival recession coverage