We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
Quintessence International



Forgotten password?


Quintessence Int 31 (2000), No. 6     1. June 2000
Quintessence Int 31 (2000), No. 6  (01.06.2000)

Page 430-434

Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: An in vitro investigation
Tung, Francis F. / Estafan, Denise / Scherer, Warren
Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate microleakage in Class II cavities restored with the condensable resin composite SureFil, placed with or without a liner and 1 of 2 different dentin bonding agents. Method and materials: Extracted noncarious human teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups of 15 each and restored according to manufacturer's instructions: group 1, SureFil and Prime & Bond NT; group 2, SureFil and PQ1; group 3, SureFil, PermaFlow, and PQ1; group 4, Heliomolar and Syntac Single-Component (control). Specimens were stored in 37°C water for 24 hours. All specimens were thermocycled between 5°C and 55°C for 500 cycles. Each specimen was immersed in 0.2% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours and then sectioned longitudinally and horizontally. Dye penetration at enamel and cementum margins were viewed at 330 magnification by 2 independent, calibrated evaluators. Specimens exhibiting dye penetration = 0.1 mm beyond the cavosurface margin were considered to have leakage. Results: Chi-square tests revealed no statistically significant differences in the presence of microleakage when all groups were analyzed together. However, 2 by 2 comparisons revealed that group 3 had significantly fewer specimens with microleakage than did groups 1, 2, or 4. Conclusion: To limit microleakage, a flowable composite should be used as a liner when a condensable composite material is used.